We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Find out more
Select Bible Use this Lookup to open a specific Bible and passage. Start here to select a Bible.
Make selected Bible the default for Lookup tool.
Book: Ch.V. Select book from A-Z list, enter chapter and verse number, and click "Go."
:
OR
  • Previous Result
  • Results
  • Look It Up Highlight any word or phrase, then click the button to begin a new search.
  • Highlight On / Off
  • Next Result

The New Oxford Annotated Bible New Revised Standard Study Bible that provides essential scholarship and guidance for Bible readers.

Related Content

Commentary on 2 Kings

Previous
Jump to: Select book from A-Z list, enter chapter and verse number, and click "Go."
Next
Text Commentary side-by-side

1.1–17 : Ahaziah and Elijah

King Ahaziah's decision upon falling out of a window (the probable meaning of lattice, v. 2 ) to send messengers to consult one of the many local manifestations of Baal in Ekron (a Philistine city about 40 km [25 mi] west of Jerusalem) leads to a confrontation with the prophet Elijah.

2 :

Baal zebub is literally “Baal/lord of the flies,” perhaps a deliberate Heb corruption of “Baal‐zebul” (“Baal the exalted”; see Mk 3.22 ), intended to express the authors’ scorn of or hostility toward this deity.

8 :

Hairy man, lit. “a man who was a lord/owner of hair,” possibly a play on words with “lord of the flies” in v. 2 .

9–14 :

This entire section plays on the Heb words “\ish \elohim,” man of God, and “\esh \elohim,” fire of God. When the officer speaks rudely to Elijah, asking the “\ish \elohim” to descend, Elijah sends down the “\esh \elohim” instead. Only when the third officer speaks to Elijah properly, treating him with respect, does he accede.

10 :

Fire is a well‐known vehicle of God's judgment in the Bible (e.g., Gen 19.24; Ex 9.23–24; cf. 1 Kings 18.38 ). The prophetic word cannot be brought under human control (cf. 1 Kings 13.1–7 ).

17 :

If Jehoram of Israel did indeed succeed Ahaziah only after Jehoram son of Jehoshaphat had properly succeeded his father (cf. 1 Kings 22.50 ), then ch 3 (in which Jehoshaphat goes to war along with Jehoram of Israel) presents a difficulty. We must assume either that there is some textual or historical confusion here or that there was a co‐regency between Jehoshaphat and his son toward the end of the former's reign.

  • Previous Result
  • Results
  • Look It Up Highlight any word or phrase, then click the button to begin a new search.
  • Highlight On / Off
  • Next Result
Oxford University Press

© 2014. All Rights Reserved. Privacy policy and legal notice